Where the soul goes after death in Hinduism

Soul After Death - Scientific Facts, Evidence, and Real Stories

The content of the article

The question of what will happen after the death of life has always been of interest to mankind - from the moment of reflection on the importance of one's own individuality. Will consciousness and personality survive after the physical shell dies? Where does the soul go after death? Scientific facts and statements by believers equally firmly prove and refute the possibility of an afterlife, immortality, the statements of eyewitnesses and scientists converge and contradict each other alike.

Proof of the existence of the soul after death

Prove the presence of the soul (anima, atman, etc.) humanity has sought since the epochs of Sumerian-Akkadian and Egyptian civilizations. In fact, all religious teachings are based on the fact that a person is made up of two entities: material and spiritual. The second component is immortal, the basis of personality, and will exist after the physical shell dies. What scientists say about the afterlife does not contradict most of the theologians' theses about the existence of the afterlife, since science originally came from monasteries when monks were knowledge collectors.

After the scientific revolution in Europe, many practitioners tried to isolate and prove the existence of the soul in the material world. At the same time, Western European philosophy defined self-confidence (self-determination) as a person's source, their creative and emotional urges and as an incentive for reflection. Against this background, the question arises what will happen to the spirit that forms the personality after the destruction of the physical body.

Before the development of physics and chemistry, the evidence for the existence of the soul was based solely on philosophical and theological works (Aristotle, Plato, canonical religious works). In the Middle Ages, alchemy tried to isolate the anima not just of a person, but of all elements, flora and fauna. Modern afterlife science and medicine seek to repair the presence of the soul based on the personal experience of eyewitnesses who have experienced clinical death, medical data, and changes in the condition of patients at various points in their life.

In Christianity

The Christian Church (in its globally recognized directions) describes human life as a preparatory phase for the hereafter. This does not mean that the material world does not matter. On the contrary, the main thing a Christian faces in life is to live so that he will subsequently go to heaven and attain eternal bliss. Evidence of a soul for a religion is not required, this thesis is the basis for religious consciousness, without it it makes no sense. The believer's personal experience can indirectly serve as confirmation of the existence of a soul for Christianity.

According to dogma, the soul of a Christian is a part of God, but it is able to independently make decisions, to create and to create. Hence there is the concept of posthumous punishment or reward depending on how a person in material existence relates to the fulfillment of the commandments. In fact, two key conditions are possible after death (and the intermediate stage applies only to Catholicism):

  • Paradise - the state of supreme bliss, close to the Creator;
  • Hell - the punishment for living an unjust and sinful life that contravened the commandments of faith, a place of eternal torment;
  • Purgatory - a place that is only present in the Catholic paradigm. The abode of those who die in peace with God but need additional cleansing from unsaved sins in life.

In Islam

According to dogmatic principles (the principle of the universe, the presence of the soul, posthumous existence), the religion of the second world, Islam, does not differ fundamentally from Christian postulates. The presence of a particle of the Creator in a person is determined in the suras of the Koran and in the religious works of Islamic theologians. A Muslim must live decently, keep the commandments, to get to heaven. Contrary to the Christian doomsday dogma in which the judge is Lord, Allah does not participate in determining where the soul will go after death (two angels judge - Nakir and Munkar) ..

In Buddhism and Hinduism

In Buddhism (in the European sense) there are two concepts: Atman (spiritual essence, higher self) and Anatman (lack of an independent person and soul). The first relates to out-of-body categories and the second to illusions of the material world. Hence, there is no precise definition of what particular part goes to and dissolves in nirvana (Buddhist paradise). One thing is certain: after the final immersion in death, from the Buddhist point of view, everyone's consciousness merges into a common self.

Human life in Hinduism, as Bard Vladimir Vysotsky accurately noted, is a series of relocations. The soul or consciousness does not go with heaven or hell, but depending on the righteousness of earthly life, they are reborn into another person, animal, plant or even stone. From this point of view, there is much more evidence of autopsy experience as there is a sufficient amount of recorded evidence once a person has fully narrated their previous life (since they could not have known about it).

In ancient religions

Judaism has not yet determined its relationship to the essence of the soul (Neshama). In this religion there are a multitude of directions and traditions that can contradict each other in basic principles. So the Sadducees are certain that Neshama is mortal and dies with the body, while the Pharisees believed them to be immortal. Some tendencies in Judaism are based on the thesis accepted from ancient Egypt that the soul must go through a cycle of rebirth in order to achieve perfection.

In fact, every religion is based on the fact that the purpose of earthly life is the return of the soul to its Creator. Believers' belief in the existence of the afterlife is largely based on belief and not on evidence. But there is no evidence to disprove the existence of the soul.

Scientifically death

The most accurate definition of death accepted in the scientific community is the irreversible loss of vital functions. Clinical death involves brief interruptions in breathing, blood flow, and brain activity, after which the patient is returned to life. The number of definitions of the end of life even in modern medicine and philosophy exceeds two dozen. That process or fact remains as secret as the fact of the presence or absence of a soul.

Evidence of the afterlife

“There is much in the world, friend Horace, that our wise men have not dreamed of” - this Shakespeare quote with a high degree of accuracy reflects the attitude of scholars towards the ignorant. After all, the fact that we don't know anything doesn't mean it doesn't at all.

Finding evidence of the existence of an afterlife is an attempt to confirm the existence of a soul. Materialists claim that the whole world is made up of only particles, but the presence of an energy essence, substance, or energy field that creates a human is in no way contradicting classical science due to unprovability (for example, the Higgs boson, a recent found particle, regarded as fiction).

Testimonies from people

In these cases, people's stories are believed to be reliable, which is confirmed by an independent commission of psychiatrists, psychologists, and theologians. They are traditionally divided into two categories: past life memories and stories of clinical death survivors. The first case is an experiment by Ian Stevenson who found about 2000 facts about reincarnation (under hypnosis, the subject cannot lie, and many of the facts given by patients have been confirmed by historical data).

Descriptions of the clinical state of death are often explained by the lack of oxygen in the human brain at this point in time and are treated with considerable skepticism. However, the strikingly identical stories recorded for more than a decade may indicate that it cannot be ruled out that a particular entity (soul) might leave the material body at the time of its death. It is worth mentioning a large number of descriptions of small details related to operating rooms, doctors and the environment, the sentences they utter that patients in a state of clinical death could not have known.

History facts

One of the historical facts of the afterlife is the resurrection of Christ. This relates not only to the foundation of the Christian faith, but also to a large number of historical documents that were not linked to one another but described the same facts and events in a single period of time. Nevertheless, for example, the famous and recognized signature of Napoleon Bonaparte should be mentioned, which in 1821 after the death of the emperor on the document of Louis XVIII. Appeared (recognized as true by modern historians) ..

Scientific proof

A famous study, which to some extent confirmed the presence of a soul, is considered to be a series of experiments ("direct weighing of the soul") by the American doctor Duncan McDougall, who recorded a stable weight loss at the time of the death of the patients observed. In five experiments confirmed by the scientific community, the weight loss was between 15 and 35 grams. Independently, science regards the following theses as "new to the science of the afterlife" as relatively proven:

  • Consciousness persists after a brain is cut off during clinical death.
  • out-of-body experience, visions that patients experience during operations;
  • Meetings with deceased relatives and people whom the patient may not even know but have described after their return;
  • general similarity in clinical experience of death;
  • scientific evidence of life after death based on the study of post-mortem transition states;
  • the lack of deficiencies in people with disabilities outside the body;
  • the opportunity for children to remember a past life.

If there is evidence of an afterlife, 100% reliable, it's hard to tell. There will always be an objective counter-thesis to every fact of the autopsy experience. Everyone has their own ideas. Until a soul is proven that even a person far from science agrees with this fact, the debate will continue. However, the scientific world seeks to maximize the study of subtle things in order to come closer to understanding and scientifically explaining human nature.